User Tools

Site Tools


legal

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
legal [2023/11/22 21:20] enusbaumlegal [2024/03/05 14:30] (current) enusbaum
Line 28: Line 28:
 In many countries, including the United States, reverse engineering for the purpose of achieving interoperability (which is a key aspect of creating an emulator) is often considered legal, falling under fair use or specific exceptions in copyright law. This legal stance aims to balance the interests of copyright holders with the advancement of technology and innovation. However, the legality is not absolute and can be complicated by factors such as the specific terms of the end-user license agreement (EULA) of the original software, and whether the software is still under copyright protection. Given that copyright terms can extend well beyond 30 years, it's possible that even older software could still be protected. As such, it’s critical for anyone considering reverse engineering for emulation purposes to consult legal expertise in their respective jurisdiction and to closely examine the copyright status and EULA terms of the software in question. In many countries, including the United States, reverse engineering for the purpose of achieving interoperability (which is a key aspect of creating an emulator) is often considered legal, falling under fair use or specific exceptions in copyright law. This legal stance aims to balance the interests of copyright holders with the advancement of technology and innovation. However, the legality is not absolute and can be complicated by factors such as the specific terms of the end-user license agreement (EULA) of the original software, and whether the software is still under copyright protection. Given that copyright terms can extend well beyond 30 years, it's possible that even older software could still be protected. As such, it’s critical for anyone considering reverse engineering for emulation purposes to consult legal expertise in their respective jurisdiction and to closely examine the copyright status and EULA terms of the software in question.
  
-The EFF has a great guide and FAQ in relation to Reverse Engineering: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq|Coders’ Rights Project Reverse Engineering FAQ]]+The EFF has an in-depth guide for Developers on the topic of Reverse Engineering: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq|Coders’ Rights Project Reverse Engineering FAQ]] 
 + 
 +===== Nintendo of America, Inc. vs. Tropic Haze LLC ===== 
 + 
 +In light of recent legal developments in the emulation community, particularly the case involving the Nintendo Switch emulator Yuzu, we have prepared a comprehensive analysis that contrasts these events with the legal and ethical foundations of MBBSEmu. 
 + 
 +For more information, please read our article: [[legal-yuzu|Navigating Legal Challenges in Emulation: MBBSEmu vs. Yuzu]]
  
 **__Disclaimer__:** The information provided on this page is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and regulations regarding reverse engineering and emulator development can vary significantly by jurisdiction and are subject to change. For specific legal advice or up-to-date information tailored to your situation, please consult with a qualified legal expert. **__Disclaimer__:** The information provided on this page is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and regulations regarding reverse engineering and emulator development can vary significantly by jurisdiction and are subject to change. For specific legal advice or up-to-date information tailored to your situation, please consult with a qualified legal expert.
  
legal.1700688038.txt · Last modified: 2023/11/22 21:20 by enusbaum