Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- legal [2023/11/22 21:19] – enusbaum
+++ legal [2024/03/05 14:30] (current) – enusbaum
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ===== What constitutes a Copyright violation? =====
-A Copyright violation for software would be copying source code for the purpose of recreating a given work. Emulators do not violate Copyright as long as their source code hasn't been copied from the original software or distribute unauthorized copies of a given original software.
+A copyright violation in the context of software development, such as for emulators like MBBSEmu, typically involves directly copying or replicating the source code of another software to create a similar product. For emulators, it's crucial to develop the code independently without utilizing the original software's source code. Additionally, distributing unauthorized copies of the original software also constitutes a violation. MBBSEmu circumvents these legal pitfalls by using a clean-room approach to code development, ensuring that its emulation functionalities are created without infringing upon the copyrighted material of the original software.
 For prior cases related to the legality of Emulators in relation to Copyright law, please see:
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 In many countries, including the United States, reverse engineering for the purpose of achieving interoperability (which is a key aspect of creating an emulator) is often considered legal, falling under fair use or specific exceptions in copyright law. This legal stance aims to balance the interests of copyright holders with the advancement of technology and innovation. However, the legality is not absolute and can be complicated by factors such as the specific terms of the end-user license agreement (EULA) of the original software, and whether the software is still under copyright protection. Given that copyright terms can extend well beyond 30 years, it's possible that even older software could still be protected. As such, it’s critical for anyone considering reverse engineering for emulation purposes to consult legal expertise in their respective jurisdiction and to closely examine the copyright status and EULA terms of the software in question.
-The EFF has a great guide and FAQ in relation to Reverse Engineering: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq|Coders’ Rights Project Reverse Engineering FAQ]]
+The EFF has an in-depth guide for Developers on the topic of Reverse Engineering: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq|Coders’ Rights Project Reverse Engineering FAQ]]
+===== Nintendo of America, Inc. vs. Tropic Haze LLC =====
+In light of recent legal developments in the emulation community, particularly the case involving the Nintendo Switch emulator Yuzu, we have prepared a comprehensive analysis that contrasts these events with the legal and ethical foundations of MBBSEmu.
+For more information, please read our article: [[legal-yuzu|Navigating Legal Challenges in Emulation: MBBSEmu vs. Yuzu]]
 **__Disclaimer__:** The information provided on this page is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and regulations regarding reverse engineering and emulator development can vary significantly by jurisdiction and are subject to change. For specific legal advice or up-to-date information tailored to your situation, please consult with a qualified legal expert.